https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312500 Criminal proceedings arising from a business supply transaction were held liable to quashing where the complaint attempted to give a civil dispute a criminal colour. The Court applied the principle that mere breach of contract does not constitute cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention existed at the time of inducement, and found the allegations to be absurd, inherently improbable and mala fide. It held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC may be used to prevent abuse of process when the complaint is legally untenable and designed to fasten criminal liability in a fundamentally civil matter. en-us Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312500 Criminal proceedings arising from a business supply transaction were held liable to quashing where the complaint attempted to give a civil dispute a criminal colour. The Court applied the principle that mere breach of contract does not constitute cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention existed at the time of inducement, and found the allegations to be absurd, inherently improbable and mala fide. It held that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC may be used to prevent abuse of process when the complaint is legally untenable and designed to fasten criminal liability in a fundamentally civil matter. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312500