https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312497 A writ challenge to attachment and proposed recovery action was found inappropriate where the property was already under income-tax recovery attachment and title was disputed. The text states that Rule 11 of the Second Schedule provides the statutory procedure for the Tax Recovery Officer to investigate claims or objections to attachment or sale, hear both sides, and decide ownership in accordance with law. The impugned communication was treated as only a notice, and the claimant was directed to pursue the prescribed recovery remedy rather than writ jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312497 A writ challenge to attachment and proposed recovery action was found inappropriate where the property was already under income-tax recovery attachment and title was disputed. The text states that Rule 11 of the Second Schedule provides the statutory procedure for the Tax Recovery Officer to investigate claims or objections to attachment or sale, hear both sides, and decide ownership in accordance with law. The impugned communication was treated as only a notice, and the claimant was directed to pursue the prescribed recovery remedy rather than writ jurisdiction. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 14 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312497