https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312494 The HC dismissed the petition to quash the FIR under sections 467, 468, 471, and 420 of the IPC, emphasizing that the allegations in the current FIR were distinct from a previous complaint involving different offenses. Citing State of Haryana Vs Bhajan Lal, the court ruled that it could not quash the FIR as it disclosed a cognizable offense. The petitioner was advised to seek legal remedies through appropriate channels. The connected Miscellaneous petition was also closed. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312494 The HC dismissed the petition to quash the FIR under sections 467, 468, 471, and 420 of the IPC, emphasizing that the allegations in the current FIR were distinct from a previous complaint involving different offenses. Citing State of Haryana Vs Bhajan Lal, the court ruled that it could not quash the FIR as it disclosed a cognizable offense. The petitioner was advised to seek legal remedies through appropriate channels. The connected Miscellaneous petition was also closed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312494