https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312494 An FIR alleging forgery and cheating in relation to a sale deed, and disclosing cognizable offences, cannot be quashed under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC where the controversy turns on disputed questions of fact. The allegations were distinct from an earlier complaint between the parties, and the factual disputes were unsuitable for determination in a quashing petition. Applying the settled principles on quashing of FIRs, the court found no basis for interference and dismissed the petition. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312494 An FIR alleging forgery and cheating in relation to a sale deed, and disclosing cognizable offences, cannot be quashed under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC where the controversy turns on disputed questions of fact. The allegations were distinct from an earlier complaint between the parties, and the factual disputes were unsuitable for determination in a quashing petition. Applying the settled principles on quashing of FIRs, the court found no basis for interference and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312494