<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1401 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312493</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the petitioners&#039; application to quash the Judicial Magistrate&#039;s order of cognizance in C.P. Case No. 822 of 2010 under IPC Sections 323/417. The court determined that the complaint contained specific allegations indicating prima facie offenses, justifying the cognizance taken by the Judicial Magistrate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 05:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1401 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312493</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the petitioners&#039; application to quash the Judicial Magistrate&#039;s order of cognizance in C.P. Case No. 822 of 2010 under IPC Sections 323/417. The court determined that the complaint contained specific allegations indicating prima facie offenses, justifying the cognizance taken by the Judicial Magistrate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>