https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312487 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 cannot be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision except in rare cases involving abuse of process or failure of justice, so the High Court was not justified in interfering with concurrent maintenance orders. On maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, a wife remains entitled unless a statutory disqualification is proved; mere assertions that she left the matrimonial home voluntarily or had some income did not by themselves defeat the claim. The maintenance order was restored and the wife's entitlement remained intact. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:38:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312487 Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 cannot be used to bypass the statutory bar on a second revision except in rare cases involving abuse of process or failure of justice, so the High Court was not justified in interfering with concurrent maintenance orders. On maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, a wife remains entitled unless a statutory disqualification is proved; mere assertions that she left the matrimonial home voluntarily or had some income did not by themselves defeat the claim. The maintenance order was restored and the wife's entitlement remained intact. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312487