https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312486 The SC concluded that the MP HC erred in dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal as non-maintainable. The SC emphasized that the nature of relief, not nomenclature, determines applicability under Articles 226 or 227. The impugned order was set aside, and the writ appeal was remanded to the Division Bench for a merits hearing. The appeal was allowed. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312486 The SC concluded that the MP HC erred in dismissing the Letters Patent Appeal as non-maintainable. The SC emphasized that the nature of relief, not nomenclature, determines applicability under Articles 226 or 227. The impugned order was set aside, and the writ appeal was remanded to the Division Bench for a merits hearing. The appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312486