https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312482 The HC upheld the lower appellate court's decision, granting the plaintiff possession of the house and mesne profits, dismissing defendant No. 2's claims of an oral will and improvements. The court recognized the plaintiff's status as a benamidar, binding the beneficial owner to the outcome. Each party bore their own appeal costs, and the improvements made by defendant No. 2 benefited the plaintiff. Defendant No. 1's conduct was noted as blameworthy, affirming the decree with adjusted costs for the second appeal. en-us Wed, 09 Sep 1931 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:43:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312482 The HC upheld the lower appellate court's decision, granting the plaintiff possession of the house and mesne profits, dismissing defendant No. 2's claims of an oral will and improvements. The court recognized the plaintiff's status as a benamidar, binding the beneficial owner to the outcome. Each party bore their own appeal costs, and the improvements made by defendant No. 2 benefited the plaintiff. Defendant No. 1's conduct was noted as blameworthy, affirming the decree with adjusted costs for the second appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Sep 1931 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312482