<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1008 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449857</link>
    <description>HC examined a GST assessment order challenging tax demand discrepancies. The court found procedural irregularities in the assessment process, including denial of adjournment requests and significant variations in tax demand. HC quashed the original order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed the assessing officer to issue a fresh assessment order after providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1008 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449857</link>
      <description>HC examined a GST assessment order challenging tax demand discrepancies. The court found procedural irregularities in the assessment process, including denial of adjournment requests and significant variations in tax demand. HC quashed the original order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed the assessing officer to issue a fresh assessment order after providing the petitioner an opportunity to be heard within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>