<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1007 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449856</link>
    <description>The HC found irregularities in GST registration cancellation, determining that the petitioner was not provided adequate opportunity to contest the decision. The court quashed the cancellation order, directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks and issue a fresh order after personal hearing, without granting interim registration benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1007 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449856</link>
      <description>The HC found irregularities in GST registration cancellation, determining that the petitioner was not provided adequate opportunity to contest the decision. The court quashed the cancellation order, directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks and issue a fresh order after personal hearing, without granting interim registration benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>