<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1001 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449850</link>
    <description>HC set aside an order creating a GST demand against the petitioner under Sections 16(2)(c) and 17(5). Recognizing procedural deficiencies and the petitioner&#039;s inability to respond due to family bereavement, the court granted one week to file a reply. The proper officer was directed to re-adjudicate the show cause notice within four weeks, ensuring a personal hearing and providing a detailed reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1001 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449850</link>
      <description>HC set aside an order creating a GST demand against the petitioner under Sections 16(2)(c) and 17(5). Recognizing procedural deficiencies and the petitioner&#039;s inability to respond due to family bereavement, the court granted one week to file a reply. The proper officer was directed to re-adjudicate the show cause notice within four weeks, ensuring a personal hearing and providing a detailed reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>