<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1000 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449849</link>
    <description>The HC quashed a retrospective GST registration cancellation order due to procedural irregularities. The court found the cancellation order lacked proper justification and the show cause notice was defective. HC directed the petitioner to file a reply within one week and mandated the tax authorities to conduct a fresh adjudication proceeding with a personal hearing within four weeks, reserving all legal rights of both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1000 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449849</link>
      <description>The HC quashed a retrospective GST registration cancellation order due to procedural irregularities. The court found the cancellation order lacked proper justification and the show cause notice was defective. HC directed the petitioner to file a reply within one week and mandated the tax authorities to conduct a fresh adjudication proceeding with a personal hearing within four weeks, reserving all legal rights of both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>