<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 999 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449848</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a GST tax demand order under Section 73, finding procedural deficiencies. The court set aside the impugned order due to inadequate reasoning, lack of proper hearing, and failure to address the taxpayer&#039;s comprehensive responses. HC directed re-adjudication with a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present their case and clarify tax-related allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 999 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449848</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a GST tax demand order under Section 73, finding procedural deficiencies. The court set aside the impugned order due to inadequate reasoning, lack of proper hearing, and failure to address the taxpayer&#039;s comprehensive responses. HC directed re-adjudication with a fair opportunity for the petitioner to present their case and clarify tax-related allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>