<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 996 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449845</link>
    <description>In a GST economic offence involving alleged forged invoices, paper transactions and wrongful input tax credit, the HC treated the seriousness of the fiscal allegations and the ongoing investigation as decisive against release on regular bail. The Court held that the prima facie claim of substantial revenue loss and the reasonable apprehension of prejudice to the investigation outweighed long pre-trial custody on the facts. Regular bail was therefore declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 996 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449845</link>
      <description>In a GST economic offence involving alleged forged invoices, paper transactions and wrongful input tax credit, the HC treated the seriousness of the fiscal allegations and the ongoing investigation as decisive against release on regular bail. The Court held that the prima facie claim of substantial revenue loss and the reasonable apprehension of prejudice to the investigation outweighed long pre-trial custody on the facts. Regular bail was therefore declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>