https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449843 Pending a writ petition challenging recovery of input tax credit demand, the Delhi HC considered whether coercive recovery could proceed and whether interim protection was justified. The dispute concerned the GST rate applicable to tyres, tubes and flaps, including whether the supplies amounted to a bundled supply and whether tax at 28% was payable on tubes and flaps. The Court recorded that the petitioners' submissions were not insubstantial and granted interim protection by restraining coercive steps under the impugned order until the next date of hearing. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Apr 2025 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449843 Pending a writ petition challenging recovery of input tax credit demand, the Delhi HC considered whether coercive recovery could proceed and whether interim protection was justified. The dispute concerned the GST rate applicable to tyres, tubes and flaps, including whether the supplies amounted to a bundled supply and whether tax at 28% was payable on tubes and flaps. The Court recorded that the petitioners' submissions were not insubstantial and granted interim protection by restraining coercive steps under the impugned order until the next date of hearing. Case-Laws GST Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449843