<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 991 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449840</link>
    <description>The MP HC dismissed a petition by a suspended employee seeking higher interest on tax refund. The petitioner, suspended from 1996-2007, received subsistence allowance and claimed relief under Section 89(1) of IT Act. The court held that Section 89 relief is a rebate/adjustment against tax liability, not a refundable amount. The IT Department correctly calculated the refund amount and paid interest at statutory rate of 0.5% per month under Section 244A(1). The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim for 18% interest, noting no legal provision supports such higher rate and the Department had already paid more interest than calculated by the petitioner&#039;s chartered accountant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 991 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449840</link>
      <description>The MP HC dismissed a petition by a suspended employee seeking higher interest on tax refund. The petitioner, suspended from 1996-2007, received subsistence allowance and claimed relief under Section 89(1) of IT Act. The court held that Section 89 relief is a rebate/adjustment against tax liability, not a refundable amount. The IT Department correctly calculated the refund amount and paid interest at statutory rate of 0.5% per month under Section 244A(1). The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim for 18% interest, noting no legal provision supports such higher rate and the Department had already paid more interest than calculated by the petitioner&#039;s chartered accountant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>