<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Goods Re-export Violation Upheld Despite Financial Hardship; CESTAT Confirms Non-compliance with Notification No. 27/2002-Cus.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75062</link>
    <description>Re-exported goods after three years - Violation of Notification No. 27/2002-Cus - The Commissioner (Appeals) considered the appellant&#039;s financial problems but ultimately concluded that the non-compliance with the notification&#039;s conditions was not excusable. - The CESTAT sustained the order of Commissioner (Appeals)</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Goods Re-export Violation Upheld Despite Financial Hardship; CESTAT Confirms Non-compliance with Notification No. 27/2002-Cus.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75062</link>
      <description>Re-exported goods after three years - Violation of Notification No. 27/2002-Cus - The Commissioner (Appeals) considered the appellant&#039;s financial problems but ultimately concluded that the non-compliance with the notification&#039;s conditions was not excusable. - The CESTAT sustained the order of Commissioner (Appeals)</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>