<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 971 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449820</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition, refusing to interfere with the HC&#039;s interpretation that government assignment or transfer of the right to use radio-frequency spectrum does not fall under declared service in clause (e) of Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994 but is covered by clause (j). The Court held there was no scope for interference under Art.136 and declined to disturb the High Court&#039;s finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 971 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449820</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the special leave petition, refusing to interfere with the HC&#039;s interpretation that government assignment or transfer of the right to use radio-frequency spectrum does not fall under declared service in clause (e) of Section 66E of the Finance Act, 1994 but is covered by clause (j). The Court held there was no scope for interference under Art.136 and declined to disturb the High Court&#039;s finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>