<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CESTAT finds no intent to evade taxes; extended penalty period u/s 78 not justified; appeal allowed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75058</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty u/s 78 - The CESTAT held that, No evidence of positive act of suppression to evade payment of duty. Extended period cannot be invoked without evidence of intent to evade payment. Mere non-payment of service tax and non-filing of returns not sufficient to extend limitation period. - Order set aside, appeal allowed with consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CESTAT finds no intent to evade taxes; extended penalty period u/s 78 not justified; appeal allowed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75058</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty u/s 78 - The CESTAT held that, No evidence of positive act of suppression to evade payment of duty. Extended period cannot be invoked without evidence of intent to evade payment. Mere non-payment of service tax and non-filing of returns not sufficient to extend limitation period. - Order set aside, appeal allowed with consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>