<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 961 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449810</link>
    <description>The HC addressed a petition challenging the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of an appeal due to the petitioner&#039;s absence during the hearing. The respondent objected to the petition&#039;s maintainability, citing a prior Tribunal ruling on the service classification issue and suggesting the Supreme Court as the appropriate forum for appeal. The petitioner opted to withdraw the petition, and the HC allowed this withdrawal, dismissing the petition as withdrawn while preserving the parties&#039; rights for future legal actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 961 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449810</link>
      <description>The HC addressed a petition challenging the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of an appeal due to the petitioner&#039;s absence during the hearing. The respondent objected to the petition&#039;s maintainability, citing a prior Tribunal ruling on the service classification issue and suggesting the Supreme Court as the appropriate forum for appeal. The petitioner opted to withdraw the petition, and the HC allowed this withdrawal, dismissing the petition as withdrawn while preserving the parties&#039; rights for future legal actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>