<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 952 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449801</link>
    <description>Limitation under section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 applies only after a deemed assessment under section 22(2). Where returns are not filed, or are incomplete, incorrect, or unsupported by prescribed documents and proof of payment, section 22(4) applies and the Assessing Authority must make a best judgment assessment after the year ends, so the deemed assessment protection is unavailable. The court also noted that whether returns were complete and correct is a disputed factual question that cannot be conclusively decided in writ proceedings under Article 226. On that basis, the limitation challenge failed and the assessment proceedings were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 952 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449801</link>
      <description>Limitation under section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 applies only after a deemed assessment under section 22(2). Where returns are not filed, or are incomplete, incorrect, or unsupported by prescribed documents and proof of payment, section 22(4) applies and the Assessing Authority must make a best judgment assessment after the year ends, so the deemed assessment protection is unavailable. The court also noted that whether returns were complete and correct is a disputed factual question that cannot be conclusively decided in writ proceedings under Article 226. On that basis, the limitation challenge failed and the assessment proceedings were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>