<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 949 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449798</link>
    <description>A fresh tax demand could not be raised against a concluded VAT assessment without first invoking the statutorily prescribed reassessment procedure and complying with natural justice. Because the assessment had already been finalised and the disputed liability quantified and paid, the further demand and refund adjustment were unsustainable in the absence of any show cause notice or hearing. Bombay HC therefore quashed the impugned communications and directed refund of the admitted amount in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:10:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 949 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449798</link>
      <description>A fresh tax demand could not be raised against a concluded VAT assessment without first invoking the statutorily prescribed reassessment procedure and complying with natural justice. Because the assessment had already been finalised and the disputed liability quantified and paid, the further demand and refund adjustment were unsustainable in the absence of any show cause notice or hearing. Bombay HC therefore quashed the impugned communications and directed refund of the admitted amount in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>