https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449796 The MP HC dismissed a petition challenging rejection of a technical bid for submitting unaudited balance sheet and profit loss account for 2017-18. The petitioner participated in the NIT without objection but challenged the mandatory audited financial documents requirement only after disqualification. The HC held that petitioner was estopped from challenging NIT conditions after participating and failing. The court emphasized that writ petitions under Article 226 are not maintainable for contract enforcement, citing Supreme Court precedent in Surjeet Singh Sahni. The bid disqualification required no judicial interference. en-us Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2024 23:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449796 The MP HC dismissed a petition challenging rejection of a technical bid for submitting unaudited balance sheet and profit loss account for 2017-18. The petitioner participated in the NIT without objection but challenged the mandatory audited financial documents requirement only after disqualification. The HC held that petitioner was estopped from challenging NIT conditions after participating and failing. The court emphasized that writ petitions under Article 226 are not maintainable for contract enforcement, citing Supreme Court precedent in Surjeet Singh Sahni. The bid disqualification required no judicial interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449796