<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 2028 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312476</link>
    <description>Where final products were cleared under an area-based excise exemption, Education Cess and Higher Education Cess paid along with the exempt duty were refundable. The CESTAT followed the Supreme Court ruling in SRD Nutrients Pvt. Limited, which held that once excise duty itself is exempted, the cess levied with that duty cannot be retained by the Revenue. The remaining grounds were not pressed, and the refund claim was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 19:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 2028 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312476</link>
      <description>Where final products were cleared under an area-based excise exemption, Education Cess and Higher Education Cess paid along with the exempt duty were refundable. The CESTAT followed the Supreme Court ruling in SRD Nutrients Pvt. Limited, which held that once excise duty itself is exempted, the cess levied with that duty cannot be retained by the Revenue. The remaining grounds were not pressed, and the refund claim was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>