<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1483 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312472</link>
    <description>Cash deposited during demonetisation could not be taxed as unexplained money under section 69A where the cash balance was recorded in the cash book, supported by audited books, corroborative records and accepted opening cash balance, and where the receipts were shown as business income from pharmacy and hospital operations. The addition was deleted because the same recorded receipts could not be taxed again as undisclosed income. An estimated enhancement at 4% of the specified banknote deposits was also unsustainable, as it rested on residual doubt rather than any proved defect in the books or receipts. The deletion of both additions was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1483 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312472</link>
      <description>Cash deposited during demonetisation could not be taxed as unexplained money under section 69A where the cash balance was recorded in the cash book, supported by audited books, corroborative records and accepted opening cash balance, and where the receipts were shown as business income from pharmacy and hospital operations. The addition was deleted because the same recorded receipts could not be taxed again as undisclosed income. An estimated enhancement at 4% of the specified banknote deposits was also unsustainable, as it rested on residual doubt rather than any proved defect in the books or receipts. The deletion of both additions was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>