<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (5) TMI 290 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the promotion criteria based on the year of passing the qualifying examination, aligning with previous HC and Tribunal decisions. The SC dismissed challenges to this approach, confirming its finality. Applicants were granted notional promotions and seniority refixation with retrospective effect but were denied back wages, consistent with the principle of no pay for no work. The Tribunal ordered refutation of present pay without back wages, except from the date individuals actually worked in higher positions, a stance supported by prior SC rulings. The decision balanced relief with practical implications of seniority revisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:43:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (5) TMI 290 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the promotion criteria based on the year of passing the qualifying examination, aligning with previous HC and Tribunal decisions. The SC dismissed challenges to this approach, confirming its finality. Applicants were granted notional promotions and seniority refixation with retrospective effect but were denied back wages, consistent with the principle of no pay for no work. The Tribunal ordered refutation of present pay without back wages, except from the date individuals actually worked in higher positions, a stance supported by prior SC rulings. The decision balanced relief with practical implications of seniority revisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>