<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) and Assessing Officer to verify and re-examine several issues. It permitted the deduction for the 20 Point Programme expenditure and LPG bottling plant activities, while setting aside other matters for further investigation, such as the notional amount under Section 14A, post-retirement medical benefits, and the technical know-how claim. Some grounds were dismissed or not admitted, including the tax on dividends to the Government and feasibility study expenses. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to previous rulings and required detailed examination for certain deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes, directing the CIT(A) and Assessing Officer to verify and re-examine several issues. It permitted the deduction for the 20 Point Programme expenditure and LPG bottling plant activities, while setting aside other matters for further investigation, such as the notional amount under Section 14A, post-retirement medical benefits, and the technical know-how claim. Some grounds were dismissed or not admitted, including the tax on dividends to the Government and feasibility study expenses. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to previous rulings and required detailed examination for certain deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>