<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 915 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449764</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere because the matter rested on concurrent findings of fact. The Special Leave Petitions were therefore dismissed, and the pending application was disposed of accordingly. The order reflects the limited scope of interference where lower forums have reached the same factual conclusion and no separate ground for interference is shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 915 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449764</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere because the matter rested on concurrent findings of fact. The Special Leave Petitions were therefore dismissed, and the pending application was disposed of accordingly. The order reflects the limited scope of interference where lower forums have reached the same factual conclusion and no separate ground for interference is shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>