<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 886 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449735</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the Rs. 13 lakhs seized should not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the assessee had adequately explained the cash transfer between branches, with no negative cash balance recorded during the relevant period. The cash reconciliation statement submitted by the assessee was accepted, leading to the acceptance of the grounds raised and the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 07:32:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 886 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449735</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that the Rs. 13 lakhs seized should not be treated as unexplained money under section 69A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the assessee had adequately explained the cash transfer between branches, with no negative cash balance recorded during the relevant period. The cash reconciliation statement submitted by the assessee was accepted, leading to the acceptance of the grounds raised and the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>