https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449726 Export permission could not be granted for the full contracted quantity of non-basmati white rice while the challenge to the export restriction notification remained undecided. The notification, issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 and the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023, continued to operate unless it was first sustained or invalidated. Because the writ relief was granted after the challenge to the notification was withdrawn and without adjudicating its validity, the appellate court held that final substantive relief was premature. The permission order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration. en-us Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Feb 2024 06:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449726 Export permission could not be granted for the full contracted quantity of non-basmati white rice while the challenge to the export restriction notification remained undecided. The notification, issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 and the Foreign Trade Policy, 2023, continued to operate unless it was first sustained or invalidated. Because the writ relief was granted after the challenge to the notification was withdrawn and without adjudicating its validity, the appellate court held that final substantive relief was premature. The permission order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449726