<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 871 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449720</link>
    <description>Where material issues affecting maintainability of a section 7 insolvency petition are not properly framed or decided, including whether applicants are speculative investors or allottees, the validity of authorisation, stamp duty compliance, locus, and the minimum threshold under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the dismissal cannot stand on an incomplete record. The appellate tribunal found that these questions went to the root of the petition and required a reasoned determination after hearing both sides. The matter was therefore remitted for de novo consideration, with liberty to raise all factual and legal objections before the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2024 05:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 871 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449720</link>
      <description>Where material issues affecting maintainability of a section 7 insolvency petition are not properly framed or decided, including whether applicants are speculative investors or allottees, the validity of authorisation, stamp duty compliance, locus, and the minimum threshold under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the dismissal cannot stand on an incomplete record. The appellate tribunal found that these questions went to the root of the petition and required a reasoned determination after hearing both sides. The matter was therefore remitted for de novo consideration, with liberty to raise all factual and legal objections before the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>