<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1308 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that advertisement receipts should be taxed on a cash basis due to the absence of maintained books of account in India, aligning with a prior High Court decision. Consequently, the issue was resolved against the Revenue. Regarding interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, the Tribunal found this matter to be consequential and instructed the Assessing Officer to levy interest according to the law. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the order pronounced on January 1, 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2024 12:21:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1308 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that advertisement receipts should be taxed on a cash basis due to the absence of maintained books of account in India, aligning with a prior High Court decision. Consequently, the issue was resolved against the Revenue. Regarding interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, the Tribunal found this matter to be consequential and instructed the Assessing Officer to levy interest according to the law. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the order pronounced on January 1, 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>