<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 858 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449707</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax assessment orders. The court found the proceedings arbitrary due to non-provision of SIB report to the petitioner, violating natural justice principles. The matter was remitted back to the adjudicating authority with directions to provide all relevant documents and grant the petitioner an opportunity to respond within two weeks, with final resolution mandated within six weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=744008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 858 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449707</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax assessment orders. The court found the proceedings arbitrary due to non-provision of SIB report to the petitioner, violating natural justice principles. The matter was remitted back to the adjudicating authority with directions to provide all relevant documents and grant the petitioner an opportunity to respond within two weeks, with final resolution mandated within six weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>