<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (3) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35851</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a partner in a dissolved firm, in a dispute over a notice demanding payment under s. 182(4) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the liability of the firm under s. 182(4) is limited to 30% of the partner&#039;s share income. It also determined that the firm&#039;s payments towards the deceased partner&#039;s tax exceeded this liability, quashing the order for the remaining balance. The court emphasized the joint and several liability of partners even after firm dissolution and directed the tax authorities to issue a fresh demand for the outstanding amount owed by the firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:55:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (3) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35851</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a partner in a dissolved firm, in a dispute over a notice demanding payment under s. 182(4) of the Income Tax Act. The court held that the liability of the firm under s. 182(4) is limited to 30% of the partner&#039;s share income. It also determined that the firm&#039;s payments towards the deceased partner&#039;s tax exceeded this liability, quashing the order for the remaining balance. The court emphasized the joint and several liability of partners even after firm dissolution and directed the tax authorities to issue a fresh demand for the outstanding amount owed by the firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>