<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 818 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449667</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere in a Central Excise matter and dismissed the special leave petition. The order records only that the Court heard counsel for both sides and was not inclined to intervene, with pending applications disposed of accordingly. No substantive legal principle, statutory interpretation, or merits-based finding is stated in the text beyond the refusal to grant leave.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 818 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449667</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere in a Central Excise matter and dismissed the special leave petition. The order records only that the Court heard counsel for both sides and was not inclined to intervene, with pending applications disposed of accordingly. No substantive legal principle, statutory interpretation, or merits-based finding is stated in the text beyond the refusal to grant leave.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>