<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 811 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449660</link>
    <description>Bombay HC allowed appeal against accused&#039;s acquittal in cheque dishonour case. Trial court erroneously acquitted accused despite failure to rebut Section 139 presumption under Negotiable Instruments Act. Documentary evidence established accused obtained loan of Rs. 6 lakhs with 15% interest, repayable in 60 instalments. Cheque amount was less than outstanding loan balance shown in ledger. Accused admitted signature, received legal notice at registered address without reply, and raised no defence regarding notice receipt. HC held presumption under Section 139 remained unrebutted, requiring conviction. Trial court&#039;s order quashed and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2024 06:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 811 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449660</link>
      <description>Bombay HC allowed appeal against accused&#039;s acquittal in cheque dishonour case. Trial court erroneously acquitted accused despite failure to rebut Section 139 presumption under Negotiable Instruments Act. Documentary evidence established accused obtained loan of Rs. 6 lakhs with 15% interest, repayable in 60 instalments. Cheque amount was less than outstanding loan balance shown in ledger. Accused admitted signature, received legal notice at registered address without reply, and raised no defence regarding notice receipt. HC held presumption under Section 139 remained unrebutted, requiring conviction. Trial court&#039;s order quashed and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>