https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312431 Territorial jurisdiction was upheld because the ECIR was treated as consequential to the FIR lodged within the court's territorial limits, so the objection based only on the ECIR's Delhi registration failed. Interim protection was then granted because the dispute appeared prima facie civil in nature, the criminal process seemed to be used as pressure, and the informant had not first pursued civil remedies. Relying on earlier protective directions, the court stayed further proceedings in the FIR and ECIR against the petitioners and barred coercive action pending further hearing. en-us Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:05:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312431 Territorial jurisdiction was upheld because the ECIR was treated as consequential to the FIR lodged within the court's territorial limits, so the objection based only on the ECIR's Delhi registration failed. Interim protection was then granted because the dispute appeared prima facie civil in nature, the criminal process seemed to be used as pressure, and the informant had not first pursued civil remedies. Relying on earlier protective directions, the court stayed further proceedings in the FIR and ECIR against the petitioners and barred coercive action pending further hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312431