<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 809 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449658</link>
    <description>The HC examined a GST demand notice challenge, finding the petitioner has an available appeal remedy under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act. The court declined to entertain the direct petition, directing the petitioner to pursue alternate statutory remedies. While noting uncertainties regarding the GST Appellate Tribunal&#039;s operational status, the HC preserved the petitioner&#039;s right to appeal and limitation periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 15:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 809 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449658</link>
      <description>The HC examined a GST demand notice challenge, finding the petitioner has an available appeal remedy under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act. The court declined to entertain the direct petition, directing the petitioner to pursue alternate statutory remedies. While noting uncertainties regarding the GST Appellate Tribunal&#039;s operational status, the HC preserved the petitioner&#039;s right to appeal and limitation periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>