<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 24 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35842</link>
    <description>Interest on securities under section 8 of the 1922 Act was treated as taxable on receipt basis, so interest actually received in the previous year was correctly brought to tax in assessment year 1961-62. The fact that the same income had also been assessed in earlier years did not justify deleting the proper assessment for the year of receipt, because the key question was the legally correct assessment year. However, the same amount could not remain taxed twice, so relief had to be given to remove the duplication and prevent double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 24 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35842</link>
      <description>Interest on securities under section 8 of the 1922 Act was treated as taxable on receipt basis, so interest actually received in the previous year was correctly brought to tax in assessment year 1961-62. The fact that the same income had also been assessed in earlier years did not justify deleting the proper assessment for the year of receipt, because the key question was the legally correct assessment year. However, the same amount could not remain taxed twice, so relief had to be given to remove the duplication and prevent double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=35842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>