<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 800 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449649</link>
    <description>HC of Andhra Pradesh addressed a GST tax recovery case involving a sub-contractor challenging a garnishee notice. The court declined to lift the bank attachment but directed the tax authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation for time-bound tax payment. The authority must provide a hearing and issue an order within one week, offering procedural relief without fully reversing the tax recovery process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 800 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449649</link>
      <description>HC of Andhra Pradesh addressed a GST tax recovery case involving a sub-contractor challenging a garnishee notice. The court declined to lift the bank attachment but directed the tax authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation for time-bound tax payment. The authority must provide a hearing and issue an order within one week, offering procedural relief without fully reversing the tax recovery process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>