<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 799 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449648</link>
    <description>In a GST prosecution, the HC granted regular bail under Section 439 CrPC, noting that the allegations were serious but remained to be tested at trial. The petitioner had been in custody for about seven months, and the Court found that continued detention was not shown to serve any useful purpose at that stage. Bail was therefore allowed, with custody length and the untested nature of the accusations weighing in favour of release.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 799 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449648</link>
      <description>In a GST prosecution, the HC granted regular bail under Section 439 CrPC, noting that the allegations were serious but remained to be tested at trial. The petitioner had been in custody for about seven months, and the Court found that continued detention was not shown to serve any useful purpose at that stage. Bail was therefore allowed, with custody length and the untested nature of the accusations weighing in favour of release.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>