https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449645 Anticipatory bail was refused where the allegations showed that the petitioner and a co-accused created a non-functional firm from rented premises with no real business activity and used it to issue fake bills and generate fictitious transactions for GST evasion. The Court treated the alleged scheme as serious economic wrongdoing causing substantial loss to the public exchequer and held that custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the modus operandi. On that basis, pre-arrest protection was found unjustified and the bail application was rejected. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 May 2026 14:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449645 Anticipatory bail was refused where the allegations showed that the petitioner and a co-accused created a non-functional firm from rented premises with no real business activity and used it to issue fake bills and generate fictitious transactions for GST evasion. The Court treated the alleged scheme as serious economic wrongdoing causing substantial loss to the public exchequer and held that custodial interrogation was necessary to uncover the modus operandi. On that basis, pre-arrest protection was found unjustified and the bail application was rejected. Case-Laws GST Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449645