<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 795 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449644</link>
    <description>HC Madras quashed 100% penalty on GST dues for a civil works contractor who filed a rectification application after receiving an assessment order. The court remanded the matter to the assessing officer for reconsideration of penalty within two months, providing relief to the petitioner regarding the penalty imposition under section 73 of TNGST Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2025 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 795 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449644</link>
      <description>HC Madras quashed 100% penalty on GST dues for a civil works contractor who filed a rectification application after receiving an assessment order. The court remanded the matter to the assessing officer for reconsideration of penalty within two months, providing relief to the petitioner regarding the penalty imposition under section 73 of TNGST Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>