<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 789 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee had accepted a cash loan from his son, claiming it was necessary to meet urgent business needs. The Tribunal found the transaction genuine and accounted for in both parties&#039; books, establishing a reasonable cause for the cash loan. Consequently, the penalty was vacated, with the decision pronounced on 14th February 2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 789 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee had accepted a cash loan from his son, claiming it was necessary to meet urgent business needs. The Tribunal found the transaction genuine and accounted for in both parties&#039; books, establishing a reasonable cause for the cash loan. Consequently, the penalty was vacated, with the decision pronounced on 14th February 2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>