<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 784 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449633</link>
    <description>Sales commission paid to a US subsidiary was treated as non-taxable fees for technical services because the services were sales and marketing support, not technical, managerial or consultancy services, and the India-USA DTAA make-available test was not satisfied; no tax deduction at source was therefore required under section 40(a)(i). ESOP-related expenditure was considered deductible business expenditure under section 37(1) because it represented an ascertained business liability and not a contingent or capital outlay. Provision for doubtful debts was also allowable where the amount was reduced from sundry debtors in the books, constituting an actual write-off under section 36(1)(vii).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 784 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449633</link>
      <description>Sales commission paid to a US subsidiary was treated as non-taxable fees for technical services because the services were sales and marketing support, not technical, managerial or consultancy services, and the India-USA DTAA make-available test was not satisfied; no tax deduction at source was therefore required under section 40(a)(i). ESOP-related expenditure was considered deductible business expenditure under section 37(1) because it represented an ascertained business liability and not a contingent or capital outlay. Provision for doubtful debts was also allowable where the amount was reduced from sundry debtors in the books, constituting an actual write-off under section 36(1)(vii).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>