<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 770 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449619</link>
    <description>The CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal challenging denial of CENVAT credit on services received from M/s SVPL. The HC held that statements recorded during investigation were inadmissible as evidence since the Department failed to comply with Section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944, which is mandatory in quasi-criminal proceedings involving penalties. The appellant provided thirteen work orders, invoices totaling Rs. 19,55,61,900/- including service tax of Rs. 1,82,61,900/-, and a Chartered Engineer&#039;s Certificate proving services were actually received. The Department produced no evidence except inadmissible statements to contradict the documentary evidence. The CESTAT ruled the Adjudicating Authority wrongly rejected the certificate and set aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:29:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 770 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449619</link>
      <description>The CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal challenging denial of CENVAT credit on services received from M/s SVPL. The HC held that statements recorded during investigation were inadmissible as evidence since the Department failed to comply with Section 9D of Central Excise Act, 1944, which is mandatory in quasi-criminal proceedings involving penalties. The appellant provided thirteen work orders, invoices totaling Rs. 19,55,61,900/- including service tax of Rs. 1,82,61,900/-, and a Chartered Engineer&#039;s Certificate proving services were actually received. The Department produced no evidence except inadmissible statements to contradict the documentary evidence. The CESTAT ruled the Adjudicating Authority wrongly rejected the certificate and set aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>