https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449617 CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of job worker manufacturing biscuits under principal manufacturer's brand name. The case involved distribution of input service credit from principal manufacturer to contract manufacturing units and duty payment on MRP less permissible abatement under Section 4A of Central Excise Act. Following precedent set by larger bench in Krishna Food Products case, CESTAT held that job worker was entitled to CENVAT credit on input services. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, settling the issue in favor of the assessee. en-us Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449617 CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of job worker manufacturing biscuits under principal manufacturer's brand name. The case involved distribution of input service credit from principal manufacturer to contract manufacturing units and duty payment on MRP less permissible abatement under Section 4A of Central Excise Act. Following precedent set by larger bench in Krishna Food Products case, CESTAT held that job worker was entitled to CENVAT credit on input services. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, settling the issue in favor of the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=449617