https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312423 The Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal, while exercising transfer power under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, had no authority to stay proceedings before a two-member Bench or nullify its interim order. Section 25 permits transfer only, while interim relief is governed by Section 24 and remains within the seised Bench's jurisdiction. Section 5(6) does not authorise a smaller forum or single Member to vacate or render ineffective an order passed by a larger Bench unless the statute expressly provides otherwise. The stay order was therefore unsustainable in law, and the High Court's interference was upheld. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2024 05:17:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312423 The Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal, while exercising transfer power under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, had no authority to stay proceedings before a two-member Bench or nullify its interim order. Section 25 permits transfer only, while interim relief is governed by Section 24 and remains within the seised Bench's jurisdiction. Section 5(6) does not authorise a smaller forum or single Member to vacate or render ineffective an order passed by a larger Bench unless the statute expressly provides otherwise. The stay order was therefore unsustainable in law, and the High Court's interference was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312423