<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1433 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312420</link>
    <description>Interim protection was granted against further proceedings arising from an FIR alleging offences of cheating, forgery and conspiracy, and the consequential ECIR, pending consideration of the connected writ petition. The Court relied on the fact that an identical matter had already been entertained with interim protection in a connected writ petition, and noted that although recall proceedings before the Supreme Court and an SLP against the earlier interim order were said to be pending, no stay of those orders had been passed. In those circumstances, it found no basis to take a different view and stayed summoning and coercive action till the next date of listing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:50:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1433 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312420</link>
      <description>Interim protection was granted against further proceedings arising from an FIR alleging offences of cheating, forgery and conspiracy, and the consequential ECIR, pending consideration of the connected writ petition. The Court relied on the fact that an identical matter had already been entertained with interim protection in a connected writ petition, and noted that although recall proceedings before the Supreme Court and an SLP against the earlier interim order were said to be pending, no stay of those orders had been passed. In those circumstances, it found no basis to take a different view and stayed summoning and coercive action till the next date of listing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>