<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1434 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312418</link>
    <description>Receipts from centralized hotel support services were treated as business income because the services were predominantly advertising, marketing, reservation and promotion functions under a separate agreement. The analysis concluded that they did not constitute fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act or fees for included services under Article 12 of the India-USA tax treaty, as they were neither ancillary to any royalty-bearing right nor did they satisfy the make available condition. The integrated arrangement could not be split to characterise part of the receipts as royalty or technical services. In the absence of a permanent establishment in India, the receipts were not taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:50:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1434 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312418</link>
      <description>Receipts from centralized hotel support services were treated as business income because the services were predominantly advertising, marketing, reservation and promotion functions under a separate agreement. The analysis concluded that they did not constitute fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act or fees for included services under Article 12 of the India-USA tax treaty, as they were neither ancillary to any royalty-bearing right nor did they satisfy the make available condition. The integrated arrangement could not be split to characterise part of the receipts as royalty or technical services. In the absence of a permanent establishment in India, the receipts were not taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=312418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>