<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Incorrect E-Way Bill Address as Clerical Error, Not Tax Evasion; Penalty Orders Quashed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74937</link>
    <description>Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way bills was the registered office of the petitioner, suggesting a technical or clerical error rather than an intentional attempt to evade tax. - The court concludes that since most documents were accompanied with the goods and only some E-Way bills contained errors, with correct addresses mentioned elsewhere, no presumption of tax evasion arises. - Consequently, the penalty orders quashed and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:23:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=743764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Incorrect E-Way Bill Address as Clerical Error, Not Tax Evasion; Penalty Orders Quashed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74937</link>
      <description>Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way bills was the registered office of the petitioner, suggesting a technical or clerical error rather than an intentional attempt to evade tax. - The court concludes that since most documents were accompanied with the goods and only some E-Way bills contained errors, with correct addresses mentioned elsewhere, no presumption of tax evasion arises. - Consequently, the penalty orders quashed and set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 13:23:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=74937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>